R.
Preston McAfee is the J. Stanley Johnson Professor of Business, Economics, and
Management at the California Institute of Technology and is currently working at
Yahoo! Research as Research Fellow and Vice President where he leads a group
focused on microeconomics research.
Dr.
McAfee is the author of over seventy articles published in scholarly economics
journals, many of them on auctions and
bidding. He was a coeditor of the American Economic Review for
nine years, and is an associate editor of Theoretical Economics. He is a Fellow
of the Econometric Society.
Preston
McAfee has done much to design and implement (i) markets to replace government
administrative procedures (ii) auctions of access rights to parts of the
electromagnetic spectrum, and (iii) wholesale spot markets in electric power.
Preston McAfee is an authority on industrial organization, and has advised the
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division and the USA Federal Trade
Commission.
A
Statement from R. Preston McAfee:
I'm
honored and excited to be chosen as the editor of Economic Inquiry.
Economic
Inquiry has several fundamental strengths. It has taken risks, publishing the
out-of-the-ordinary papers employing new methodologies. These are papers that
are often quite difficult to evaluate; evaluation of such papers is a strength
of the journal. In addition, Economic Inquiry has developed particular areas of
leadership, such as defense economics and sports economics, where it attracts
the best papers. My intention is to
pursue and augment these strengths with three initiatives.
First, I am seeking editorial assistance by economists willing and able to
seriously evaluate the difficult-to-evaluate papers.
Second, I am creating "specialized co-editors" who handle particular
topics in which EI either has a strength or can develop a strength because the
field is poorly served by extant journals.
Third, I have created a "no revisions option" (see below) in which
authors can get a rapid "yes or no" decision on their manuscript
instead of being dragged through endless miserable revisions.
Economic Inquiry Editor's Announcement:
No Revisions Option
Journal time to publication lags have become embarrassing.
Many authors have 5 year submission-to-print stories.
More insidious, in my view, is the gradual morphing of the referees from
evaluators to anonymous co-authors. Referees request increasingly extensive
revisions. Usually these represent
improvements, but the process takes a lot of time and effort, and the end result
is often worse owing to its committee-design.
Authors, knowing referees will make them rewrite the paper, are sloppy
with the submission. This feedback loop - submitting a sloppy paper since
referees will require rewriting it combined with a need to fix all the
sloppiness - has led to our current misery.
Moreover, the expectation that referees will rewrite papers, combined
with sloppy submissions, makes refereeing extraordinarily unpleasant.
We - the efficiency-obsessed academic discipline - have the least
efficient publication process.
The system is broken.
Consequently, Economic Inquiry is starting an experiment.
In this experiment, an author can submit under a 'no revisions' policy.
This policy means exactly what it says: if you submit under no revisions,
I (or the co-editor) will either accept or reject.
What will not happen is a request for a revision.
I will ask referees: 'is it better for Economic Inquiry to publish the paper as
is, versus reject it, and why or why not?' This
returns referees to their role of evaluator.
There will still be anonymous reports.
Authors who receive an acceptance would have the option of publishing without
changes. If a referee noticed a
minor problem and put it in the report, self-respecting authors would fix the
problem. But such fixes would not be
a condition of publication.
During the course of the experiment, an author may opt for submission under the
old system. The old system remains
the default; to opt in to the new system, please add "I submit under the
'no revisions' policy."
R.
Preston McAfee
Editor,
Economic Inquiry